Dogtown Wire

In the Beginning There Was the Prayer PDF Print E-mail
Written by Clay Miller   
Sunday, 03 August 2008
I've been watching the comments and noticing that we have had a lot of activity on the last Op-Ed piece by Eric Frances about the opening prayer at City Council meetings. I thought I would write my first Op-Ed piece about a slightly controversial topic. Here goes...

From the first page of the July 31st Senate Congressional Record :

   The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, offered the following prayer:

   Let us pray.
   Loving God, our mighty rock and fortress, we have no secrets from You. You know us far better than we know ourselves. Help the Members of this body to humble themselves before You and find in Your love a very present help in times of trouble. Touch every person in the Senate with grace and love and healing. Forgive and restore wherever there is need in heart and office and home. Help us to see that it is our weakness that qualifies us for Your strength.

   Lord, we commit this day to live and work for You, inviting the indwelling power of Your spirit to control our minds and give us discernment. We pray in the Name of Him who never fails to supply our needs. Amen.
The Invocation (or opening prayer), like it or not, has been a part of American political culture since before the Bill of Rights and the Establishment Clause, the basis of "the separation of church and state", were even written. Based on this fact the Supreme Court ruled in 1983 (Marsh v. Chambers), by a vote of 6-3, that the practice of chaplaincy, or prayers delivered by a chaplain, is "part of the fabric of our society." In these circumstances, an invocation for Divine guidance is not an establishment of religion. "It is," wrote Chief Justice Warren Burger, "simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country." The Supreme Court based it's decision on the basis of the fact that members of both the 2nd Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention employed chaplains and conducted opening prayers. The invocation is to this day a common custom throughout most of the United States of America. It has been a part of North Little Rock City Council since it's creation on April 11th, 1904 when T.C. Johnston, a local minister, gave the opening prayer and a prayer has been the traditional Council opening ever since.

There have however been challenges to this decision over the past 25 years, in the Supreme Court decision they specified that the content of the prayer is of no concern to the court unless it is proselytizing or disparaging to other faiths. This has proved to be a sticky point, with some cases and controversies stemming from the use of "Jesus" in prayers. However the Supreme Court has not made a further ruling on this issue since the Marsh v. Chambers case so this issue is still legally "fuzzy". Efforts to legislate prayer during government functions also run into problems because by the First Amendment the government is not allowed prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Even if the opening prayer was banned, it seems likely to me that citizens would chose to offer a prayer during the public comments section of council. However the invocation is not likely to go away, it seems to me to be as much a part of American tradition as "In God We Trust" or celebrating Easter as a national holiday. However I do believe that the prayer could be improved. I personally would prefer to hear a minister's prayer over a politician's (even if the politician is a former minister). Also I would prefer to have diversity with the prayers, rotating the invitations. I think the prayer could be better used not only as a time to reflect and worship, but also as an opportunity for the Council to show the breadth and depth of religious  experience in our City.

In conclusion I believe the the opening prayer is a part of tradition and as such we need to honor it, and as long as it's purpose isn't proselytizing or denigrating to other faiths it isn't a threat to anyone and should be respected as an American tradition regardless of faith. 

Texas Municipal League paper on Prayer at City Council Meetings (pdf)

What is your opinion?
Win the new iPhone from Apple! Enter Here




feed4 Comments
Levy Lover
August 03, 2008

How about just a moment of silence? That way anyone can pray to whatever or whomever they wish without one religion or the other taking precedence?

Paul J
August 03, 2008

Thank you Clay Miller for taking the time to research the prayer debate and write an informed editorial. History would seem to lean in favor of legislative prayer. Let's hope in NLR that different religions can be included or at least recognized in the interest of equal representation and basic respect. In praying, it's easy to be respectful if you try.

Big Dog Daddy
August 04, 2008

I think you hit this nail on the HEAD!
Maybe they could invite a different pastor from a different church every meeting to say the prayer. Very Nice Clay, very nice indeed.

boakley59
August 05, 2008

Tolerance, self-examination and openness are keys, I have posted some demographic data in the thread on Eric's piece. These issues are never so simple as we might wish, nor so complex that decency and fairness cannot prevail.

At one time, "separate but equal" schools seemed perfectly fine, and the natural thing that the people themselves wanted. And in large part it seems that when people have choice, we largely come up with some kind of separate but equal schools. Forced mixing is as indigestible as forced separation. I believe in time that separation by choice will fade and we'll wonder what it was about an accident of pigment that we thought separated us.

Forced prayer and banned prayer, too, are equally indigestible. We must be alert and sensitive to each other as we seek the middle ground acceptable to all, and prayers or modes of thought that make us celebrate our similarities rather than shout our differences.


Write comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 August 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Free Classified Ads

OP/ED POLICY

Dogtown Wire is an interactive publication and discussion site with registered users commenting on individual stories in Dogtown Wire. We encourage people to comment on the stories and these comments are in effect letters to the editor for each specific story.

Dogtown Wire does accept guest columns for publication. The column should be limited to 750 words and one picture will be accepted per column. The guest column must be submitted in Microsoft Word format with a picture in a jpeg format no larger than 1 Mb. Only one picture per guest column will be published. Guest columns will only be accepted electronically by e-mail to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Publication of any guest column is up to the discretion of the editor of Dogtown Wire. Please make sure you indicate the preferred guest column date for publication in Dogtown Wire. Dogtown Wire will attempt to publish the guest column on the date requested although the exact publishing date will vary, due to content and space considerations.

Sponsor

Blockbuster Total Access - 2 Weeks Free Trial

Our News Feeds

Search

Please Login






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Sponsor

Arkansas website design by Kharma Consulting Inc.